<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve been dugg and it&#8217;s hilarious</title>
	<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/</link>
	<description>the world as it exists</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mo</title>
		<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-8457</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-8457</guid>
					<description>wow wow wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow wow wow
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-8084</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-8084</guid>
					<description>I've seen your pictures for a while and I don't think you are making fun of nothing, people are making fun of themselves and you are only capturing that using your camera. The basic problem is that most of them (the ones who leave comments) are not able to autocriticize because they think their world is fabulous as it is: ugly. And that is not bad, is just bad taste.

I bellieve you are a great photographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen your pictures for a while and I don&#8217;t think you are making fun of nothing, people are making fun of themselves and you are only capturing that using your camera. The basic problem is that most of them (the ones who leave comments) are not able to autocriticize because they think their world is fabulous as it is: ugly. And that is not bad, is just bad taste.</p>
<p>I bellieve you are a great photographer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: /a</title>
		<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5656</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5656</guid>
					<description>The digg "community" is ridiculous.  I've been banned twice from it and I've stopped visiting that site and their pathetic forum ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The digg &#8220;community&#8221; is ridiculous.  I&#8217;ve been banned twice from it and I&#8217;ve stopped visiting that site and their pathetic forum ever since.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5607</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 19:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5607</guid>
					<description>Is this a bad time to point out that the Angels swept the Dodgers in the Freeway Series?

By the way, I wonder if Glamour Magazine gets this much flack for its "Glamour Don'ts" feature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a bad time to point out that the Angels swept the Dodgers in the Freeway Series?</p>
<p>By the way, I wonder if Glamour Magazine gets this much flack for its &#8220;Glamour Don&#8217;ts&#8221; feature?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: malingering</title>
		<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5587</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 05:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5587</guid>
					<description>Only a perverted man would take photos of women. Women sympathize with other women and they knit together. Don't you know?

I referred to myself as a "she" about 8 times in that article. Further proof they can't read past the title (the Digg title, not the actual title of the article).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a perverted man would take photos of women. Women sympathize with other women and they knit together. Don&#8217;t you know?</p>
<p>I referred to myself as a &#8220;she&#8221; about 8 times in that article. Further proof they can&#8217;t read past the title (the Digg title, not the actual title of the article).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bonne</title>
		<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5574</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 23:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5574</guid>
					<description>I wonder why they automatically think that you are a guy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why they automatically think that you are a guy?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jakerome</title>
		<link>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5572</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 21:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.therealmalingering.com/2007/05/20/ive-been-dugg-and-its-hilarious/#comment-5572</guid>
					<description>It's not too surprising to see those types of comments from Digg users. A Flickr project I'm working on got &lt;a href="http://www.digg.com/software/Use_the_Power_of_Digg_to_Remember_6_Million_Holocaust_Victims_on_Flickr" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dugg&lt;/a&gt;, but was soon overwhelmed by negative comments from people who didn't bother to read past the blurb, and then it was buried b/c people should get over the Holocaust &#38; forget about it, essentially. I think 90% of Diggers may Digg a story and follow the link, while there's a minority of griefers &#38; know-it-alls who like to demonstrate their ignorance to the world by making up facts and otherwise distorting things to reinforce their narrow point of view.

Good job getting Dugg. Me &#38; a few of my Flickr friends Dugg it before it the front page, as we were all still in shock over _Rebekka.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not too surprising to see those types of comments from Digg users. A Flickr project I&#8217;m working on got <a href="http://www.digg.com/software/Use_the_Power_of_Digg_to_Remember_6_Million_Holocaust_Victims_on_Flickr" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.digg.com');">Dugg</a>, but was soon overwhelmed by negative comments from people who didn&#8217;t bother to read past the blurb, and then it was buried b/c people should get over the Holocaust &amp; forget about it, essentially. I think 90% of Diggers may Digg a story and follow the link, while there&#8217;s a minority of griefers &amp; know-it-alls who like to demonstrate their ignorance to the world by making up facts and otherwise distorting things to reinforce their narrow point of view.</p>
<p>Good job getting Dugg. Me &amp; a few of my Flickr friends Dugg it before it the front page, as we were all still in shock over _Rebekka.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
